4 Comentários

1. This is good stuff Martin, I find also when youre finding an odds range for your strategy, Will use youre Law away as an example, in a previous video you removed all selections below 2.08 to gain an extra 14 points that it would have lost… but if you instead back the under 2.08 selections you will make even more profit maybe as a seperate strategy. Discarding anything with significant losses is the same is throwing away the winning strategy.

2. You guys are just snake oil salesmen. These kind of blanket statements just prove it. And that's why you push your products so much. You don't make money trading, you make money getting people to join your 'community'. Yes of course if you find a system that loses a lot from laying or backing, you could just reverse it, and true if given those exact same results again you'd obviously make money. But that's the problem, results are largely random unless over a sufficient portion size. They only develop any sort of demonstrable pattern after literally tens of thousands of selections. That's why this is largely nonsense. We've got to a stage where markets are far too accurate for these sorts of generic strategies to make any money.

3. If you are just blindly laying home teams within a certain price range, sooner or later it will get nearer to break even minus the 2% commision. The markets are efficient.
   You are always going to get profit one side but sooner or later a reversal will take place. If not you would have found the golden goose and no way would anybody give away such a system because the weight of money by everybody doing it would push the market back to efficiency.
   This system may work now but a month or a years time it will change.

4. your wrong you were laying the draw not backing the win

Comentários estão fechados.