41 Comentários

1. Great video, Ben. Many thanks

2. Wouldnt it be better to 'back under 2.5' for the first part of the match, and then after the 10 minute mark start on the 2.5? My bad if it sounds moronic, but I'm just starting with this. I've made profit on close to 90% of the trades with backing under 2.5 with the start of most matches

3. What if, to do the same thing on the over 1,5 Goals market?

4. Si può avere una traduzione italiana?

5. N=1

6. Well explained I think I'll give that a twirl… Was looking for a way into trading and this looks like a good one to start with . 👍

7. This strategy is fine because you will get a better value as the price increases when there is no goals. This is a no brainer 😆😆 Thanks for those Tennis videos am now conflicted between Football and Tennis 😆😆 This is the best Trading #Channel on YouTube. Am a Football Trading #Pro, I never considered Tennis until those videos. So thanks again and keep up the #Outstanding work…….#Bless you 👊👊

8. There is no value in dripping. When you drip in you increase long term volatility, that's it. If you do your bets in stages you forget that if goal comes in after first drip… you get profit from 33% of your stake and not from 100% of your stake. So essentially – early goal (after first drip) – less profit.. and later goal like in this video – more profit, opposing to 100% straight bet in from the start. Trading is "advanced betting" and nothing else. There is no difference between betting and trading – only that you can "specify" your bet to your needs.. like in this case guessing there will be a goal soon.. . This trade is no different to betting on over 0.5 goals or drip feeding if you like more volatility and fun. Btw why there is no live chat anymore on UFT?

9. The problem with dripping in your entry is that a proportion of your winners will only be partially matched, but ALL of your losers will be fully matched.

10. Thanks for the video Ben. I really enjoy your videos and get a heck of a lot of learning out of them ! Cheers

11. dripping will always lead to more profit,as long as your game is going to have goals

    A couple of quick questions for you, Ben:
    How long did it take you to become profitable? And what was the turning point for you?

12. Hey Ben, great content and appreciate the efforts mate. One question about trading software…which ladder interface software would you recommend or do you use? Which software..geeks toy or angel..etc does your course support??

13. These strategies always sound really good, and the winning examples are great. But I just can't understand how they can be profitable in the long run. As one loss is significantly greater, so just wipes out any profits.

14. I'm a member of UFT but Betfair banned my country and account 🙁

15. And Chelsea has just scored again in the 66th minute but i would of been insane to hold my position 😉

16. Great idea Ben, tried this on 2 matched this evening, 30% Profit on the first trade and a scratch trade on the 2nd match, both goals went in minutes after the 2nd half, I'm 100% behind the dripping method, even if you dont manage to get your full stake in position your reward to risk % should be the same as this means an early goal has been netted before you could put your final trade on around 20-25mins mark, ok you dont make as much money but a loss is worse. And by dripping your bets at higher and higher odds as times passes they will average out anyway and provide a profit providing you get a recent goal, I agree with alot of the below comments about an exit strategy and to be honest im very suprised you didnt touch on this as you do in most of the videos ive watched of yours.
    The Chelsea v Leicester match tonight, 2 goals not allowed, i was teased twice with a goal and in the end cashed out when Chelsea scored in the 46th minute for a 50p profit, was in the red £7.77 during half time, drip betting £5 each on the 10th, 15th and 20th minutes.

17. Thanks for the video, although my personal opinion in calling this 'the most profitable method confirmed!' is inaccurate, and potentially misleading. Why? Because (a) this was a sample size of 1 game, and (b) you were lucky when the goal was scored, right after your third drip back. Had the goal gone in in min 11 you would have made 3 times the profit if you have backed your full stake at min 10 compared to a drip back. In other words, it all depends on when the goal is scored.
    In order to validate your title statement, you would need to take hundreds of games as a sample size, and then we would have the answer. I get that drip backing buys you some time, but that benefit is offset if a relatively early goal is scored. My guess is there's probably not much in it, but happy to be proven wrong on a big sample.

18. I like this approach, looks like it is more viable than the traditional 100% stake from outset…..cheers.

19. Can i ask something please?
    3:30 why didnt you just lay over 2.5 @ 1.47. The back price will rise above the ley over time and can green out.
    Why would back bet it later on… then lay the bet when it scores?
    Can you drip the lay?

20. Stocks are crashing bitcoin investment right now will be at every wise individual's list. In two to three years you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today

21. If 0-0 at HT I would exit and take the loss as you would need 2 goals in the second half to be able to salvage the trade

22. Good, but what if the goal doesn't happen or happens late? How long should we wait?

23. Hi Ben! It may be better to start with a half or full steak according to game statistics (goal attempt, position) as in the case of trade under 2.5 goals. And if the goal was not scored in the first half, what would you choose, to leave or continue in the second half?

24. Kinda ideal scenario…But You need to think…a goal could be scored after first drip..and the,the profit would not be that big..🙂

25. Brilliant post as always Ben. Regarding this method' what if there isnt a goal in the first half? Do u cash out for small loss? I'm guessing the matches u choose would have a thought percentage of first half goal

26. Aston villa/Everton would have been a good one. Usually goals in Villa games and in Everton's away games, but not a thing a few days back. What next to escape a big loss.

27. isn't just backing HT 0.5 , 3 times, starting from 10min ?

28. When would you get out of the market if no goal is scored?

29. If the goal had gone in before your final drip, would it have been as profitable as going in with 100% stake at the start? I would say not.

    Dripping is only better if you are lucky enough to have the goal come after you are fully matched, if you are not that lucky then it is not better.

    Some games you will make more dripping, other games you won't. Over time it would probably even itself out, unless you are particularly good at picking games where the goal doesn't come early.

30. Timing was perfect if every trade was that easy ? But yes I agree drip in your stakes for a bigger window for your profit/loss ,also you could back 00 for insurance 👍great tips as always

31. how do you handle 0/0 at half time ben

32. The other argument for dripping is that the longer it takes for the first goal to go in does not guarantee that the lay price will drop below the back price that the first order was placed. The longer it takes for the first goal to go go in will invariably result in a loss. The need for the second goal to bring the price down into profit isn't guaranteed.

33. Thankyou Ben another excellent video guide for newbees and more experienced traders that dont have your Simulator .You are currently doing the best guides on trading no one else comes close to your quality production thanks you are amazingly kind guy and generous

34. Would you do pre game analysis in the morning say and have a list of some games you’ll get involved in ? Thanks

35. In this example I would have taken only liabilities out (no complete cash out) after the goal. The dog did score and it is very likely that this will wake the favorite up and we will get more goals in this match. I don't think a game that goes that much according to plan is a good example. If the goal had come after the first third of your stake, it would have been more profitable to go straight into the market with 100%. You should only be able to make a well-founded statement after about 300 test trades. Still, I also believe that dripping into the market is the best method for most trades.

36. Disadvantage to dripping stake into the market would be that a goal goes in before all parts are matched, in which case there would still be a small profit. Wonder if it all evens itself out over time?

37. Hey Ben, Great strategy (as usual!). I have a question.
    Say you've got 100% stake matched by 30 mins, if no goal looks likely, when is the best time to get out of the trade?
    Cheers.

38. big thx for sharing your strategy !

39. To be honest, this dimostration, hasn't really any meaning statistically. You simulated just this match. What if Gols is scored after 2 mins from your trade? With Drippin you would earn much less than full stake. You should test 200/300 match e compare two approches in order to see if Dripping stake has really an advantage on long term above Full Stake. I'm not saying it hasn't, but I have to say that this test means nothing statistically speaking.

40. You really don't have a clue. Here's 20 strategies with fancy names but l'm afraid l can't provide any ammunition to apply to these strategies. Please do keep paying me hundreds of pounds for these strategies that are all available for free online with a little research. Ben the worlds best double glazing salesman. Keep your money in your pockets. I have challenged this guy time and time again to no avail. The only money he makes is through mugs who pay for strategies that are useless without ammunition. Ask him for ammunition and you'll see him run and hide.

41. Thanks Ben
    👁 opening strategy

Comentários estão fechados.